These six things doth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto
him: A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,
a heart that devises wicked imaginations, feet that are swift
in running to evil, a false witness that speaks lies, and he that sows discord
among brethren. Proverbs 6: 16-19
What is to be done about hatred? I mean “hatred” -- yet another word coopted
and perverted by the left. It has
become an almost exclusively a political-ideological weapon, and in the world
of meta-politics, a word that the left owns and uses to their advantage. They wield it to stigmatize and delegitimize
persons or institutions insufficiently enthused about the forced march toward
the “equality” they envision and those who resist the relentless assaults on
their speech, their faith, their traditions, their heritage. If you have a traditional, Christian view of
marriage, you hate homosexuals. If you question affirmative action you hate
blacks. If you are uneasy about the
flood of third world immigrants, you hate foreigners. If you suggest that entitlement programs are
out of financial control and should be reformed, you hate (check all the boxes)
– the poor, the sick, the homeless, the disabled, the elderly, etc. Donald Trump, who during his Presidential
campaign, proposed a more vigorous vetting of Muslims entering the U.S. because
Muslims, these days, seem to be the busiest of our new comers with mass-murder
(the Orlando night club slaughter, a recent example), was roundly derided as
the candidate of hate, while Hillary Clinton who referred to her opponent’s
supporters as “deplorables”, “irredeemable, but thankfully they not part
of America” remained the exemplar of compassion.
For the cultural Marxists, their politics of
“social justice” is the practice of selective compassion: the selection of
victim-classes of oppression and bigotry and crafting the narrative of their
suffering; the identification of the recalcitrant oppressors and the undeserved
fruits of their exploitation; and the inevitable denouement, the oppressors
unmasked and excoriated – bigots, incapable of human compassion, motivated by
that primitive tribal emotion, hatred. Once
convicted as haters, they can be pushed outside the boundaries of common
humanity and rightfully denied any moral or political space to compete with
their ideas and practice their beliefs, pushed to the fringes where, if they
remain compliant, they can be “safely” ignored. This crude, delusional juxtaposition of selfless
compassion (them) versus gross visceral hatred (us) fuels the lefts’ sense of
its vast moral superiority and is the source of authority for its claim to
impose its diktats and regulate the details of everyone’s life.
Consider for a moment the frequently referenced,
self-proclaimed authority on “hate groups”, the Southern Poverty Law Center, a
disseminator of agitprop whose executors are able to live in considerably high
style by selling the absurd fiction of a threatening, powerful Ku Klux
Klan. From its website: The
SPLC is dedicated to fighting hate and bigotry and to seeking justice for the
most vulnerable members of our society. Simple and
irresistible (how can you not be against hate and bigotry?), tested and
marketed to appeal especially to a well-heeled, high minded clientele that
embraces a politics of arrested development. Being rich and being white can be
a problem – white guilt aka “white privilege”, about which, of course, the SPLC
has a lot to say. And, they can help
with that: with a generous tax deductible
check comes some guilt relief with the bonus that one gets to imagine oneself as
part of a courageous anti-fascist, anti-racist crusade battling the
multitudinous hordes of neo-Nazis and right wing bigots pouring out of the
small towns and farms of white America.
The pure cynicism beneath this fake idealism,
manufactured heroism, and virtue signaling comes straight out of Bolshevik
playbook of the 1930s, drafted and perfected by Stalin himself. From the Constitution
of the USSR, adopted in December 1936, under Stalin’s direct supervision:
ARTICLE 123.
Equality of rights of citizens of the U.S.S.R., irrespective of their
nationality or race, in all spheres of economic, state, cultural, social and
political life, is an indefeasible law. Any direct or indirect restriction of
the rights of, or, conversely, any establishment of direct or indirect
privileges for, citizens on account of their race or nationality, as well as
any advocacy of racial or national exclusiveness or hatred and contempt, is
punishable by law.
No one
could surpass the Stalinists in their professed enthusiasm for equality and no
one could question their anti-racist credentials. But with the Stalinists there is always the absurdity
and the irony that emanates from their alternative universe where everything is
the opposite of what they say. This “equality” constitutionally guaranteed as
“an indefeasible law” was drafted and promulgated during the very time when the
grey tunic wearing General Secretary of the CPSU, dedicated to advancing the
well being of the toiling masses (the “most vulnerable members” of society as
the SPLC would put it) was practicing his unique version of “hatred and contempt” with the staged
show trials of his old Bolshevik compatriots and a behind the scenes massive
political purge that sent hundreds of thousands to the Gulag and slaughtered
many thousands more.
Contemporary
Stalinists like the ones who run the SPLC have imitated their predecessors and
perfected a style of propaganda that disguises their goal, the destruction of
political opposition, by intensively moralizing their self-image with the
language of compassion and fairness and, conversely, demonizing the face and personality
of the opposition. The moralized Stalinist
of the 1930s was a little-guy-champion, anti-Fascist,
an image designed to make him always come out the winner in the game of “which
side are you on?” Even better, “Fascism” was, and still is, an
expandable-contractible sort of label, easily adjusted to fit whomever and
whenever the occasion demanded. The twenty-first century moralized Stalinist of
the SPLC ilk is an anti-racist, which
means, if he doesn’t like you, then well … forget the groveling and
self-criticism Chinese Cultural Revolution style. It does no good. You have to join that other camp of the
properly shunned, that “basket of
deplorables”. “Racism” like its
cousin “Fascism” has a similar flexibility which makes it suitable for
attachment to those disagreeable sorts far and wide.
“Hatred”
is one of a number of popular resorted to slurs in the left’s agitprop
lexicon. It joins “Fascist” “Nazi”,
“Racist”, all words that rely heavily on the imagery of Europe in the 1930s –
Mussolini’s Italy, Franco’s Spain and, of course, Hitler’s Germany. How ironic is it that today’s “progressives”
like Barack Obama who claim to see in history an “arc that bends toward justice”
have constructed a stark, historically frozen moral universe where Hitler never
really dies – he just perpetually reappears with broad support in contemporary
incarnations, for the moment, Donald Trump – and where they cannot conceive of
themselves as anything other than the moral obverse of the Brown Shirts and
goose-steppers? Of course, the more
morally repugnant and malignant your opposition, the greater by contrast the
glow of your own goodness and virtue.
Without Nazis to fall back on, the moralism of todays progressives would
go poof.
With
the frenzied and indiscriminate attachment of “hatred” to its critics, the left
exhibits its grossest defects, its rank hypocrisy and incapacity for critical
self-reflection. The unprecedented outpouring
of contempt by the left for Donald Trump and the sixty-two million Americans
who voted for him suggests that the hatred so eagerly attributed to so many
others is a projection of their own hatred and loathing to which they are astonishingly
oblivious.
There
is, finally, as we see in Proverbs
(above) a “righteous” hatred, the hatred of a just God for wickedness – lying, the
killing of innocents, vanity and deceit -- all deserved to be hated. But this is not the hatred that the left
rails against. Hatred for them is completely and ultimately political,
something that is only found on the right, something somehow that they themselves
in all their rectitude never experience. This approach of turning your critics
into deeply immoral, “irredeemable” people enables the left to advance even
further toward what they seek, a complete monopoly of power. Hatred then as a political weapon achieves
its perfection when it moves from de-moralizing the opposition to its full
criminalization -- hate crimes. With the criminalization of hate, the full,
unimpeded power of the state can be brought to bear on unpopular thinking and
speech. No competition allowed: the monopoly is complete. Hate crime laws have paralyzed the right in
Europe and Canada and cowed their populations.
Hillary Clinton’s unexpected derailment has only delayed the coming tsunami. Get ready.
No comments:
Post a Comment