Commentary on Communist history and ideology with comparisons to other Totalitarian ideologies and movements. Also links contemporary political events to ideological themes and trends.
Saturday, May 27, 2017
In Defense of Hatred -- the Right Kind
These six things doth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto
him: A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,
a heart that devises wicked imaginations, feet that are swift
in running to evil, a false witness that speaks lies, and he that sows discord
among brethren. Proverbs 6: 16-19
What is to be done about hatred? I mean “hatred” -- yet another word coopted
and perverted by the left. It has
become an almost exclusively a political-ideological weapon, and in the world
of meta-politics, a word that the left owns and uses to their advantage. They wield it to stigmatize and delegitimize
persons or institutions insufficiently enthused about the forced march toward
the “equality” they envision and those who resist the relentless assaults on
their speech, their faith, their traditions, their heritage. If you have a traditional, Christian view of
marriage, you hate homosexuals. If you question affirmative action you hate
blacks. If you are uneasy about the
flood of third world immigrants, you hate foreigners. If you suggest that entitlement programs are
out of financial control and should be reformed, you hate (check all the boxes)
– the poor, the sick, the homeless, the disabled, the elderly, etc. Donald Trump, who during his Presidential
campaign, proposed a more vigorous vetting of Muslims entering the U.S. because
Muslims, these days, seem to be the busiest of our new comers with mass-murder
(the Orlando night club slaughter, a recent example), was roundly derided as
the candidate of hate, while Hillary Clinton who referred to her opponent’s
supporters as “deplorables”, “irredeemable, but thankfully they not part
of America” remained the exemplar of compassion.
For the cultural Marxists, their politics of
“social justice” is the practice of selective compassion: the selection of
victim-classes of oppression and bigotry and crafting the narrative of their
suffering; the identification of the recalcitrant oppressors and the undeserved
fruits of their exploitation; and the inevitable denouement, the oppressors
unmasked and excoriated – bigots, incapable of human compassion, motivated by
that primitive tribal emotion, hatred. Once
convicted as haters, they can be pushed outside the boundaries of common
humanity and rightfully denied any moral or political space to compete with
their ideas and practice their beliefs, pushed to the fringes where, if they
remain compliant, they can be “safely” ignored. This crude, delusional juxtaposition of selfless
compassion (them) versus gross visceral hatred (us) fuels the lefts’ sense of
its vast moral superiority and is the source of authority for its claim to
impose its diktats and regulate the details of everyone’s life.
Consider for a moment the frequently referenced,
self-proclaimed authority on “hate groups”, the Southern Poverty Law Center, a
disseminator of agitprop whose executors are able to live in considerably high
style by selling the absurd fiction of a threatening, powerful Ku Klux
Klan. From its website: The
SPLC is dedicated to fighting hate and bigotry and to seeking justice for the
most vulnerable members of our society. Simple and
irresistible (how can you not be against hate and bigotry?), tested and
marketed to appeal especially to a well-heeled, high minded clientele that
embraces a politics of arrested development. Being rich and being white can be
a problem – white guilt aka “white privilege”, about which, of course, the SPLC
has a lot to say. And, they can help
with that: with a generous tax deductible
check comes some guilt relief with the bonus that one gets to imagine oneself as
part of a courageous anti-fascist, anti-racist crusade battling the
multitudinous hordes of neo-Nazis and right wing bigots pouring out of the
small towns and farms of white America.
The pure cynicism beneath this fake idealism,
manufactured heroism, and virtue signaling comes straight out of Bolshevik
playbook of the 1930s, drafted and perfected by Stalin himself. From the Constitution
of the USSR, adopted in December 1936, under Stalin’s direct supervision:
ARTICLE 123.
Equality of rights of citizens of the U.S.S.R., irrespective of their
nationality or race, in all spheres of economic, state, cultural, social and
political life, is an indefeasible law. Any direct or indirect restriction of
the rights of, or, conversely, any establishment of direct or indirect
privileges for, citizens on account of their race or nationality, as well as
any advocacy of racial or national exclusiveness or hatred and contempt, is
punishable by law.
No one
could surpass the Stalinists in their professed enthusiasm for equality and no
one could question their anti-racist credentials. But with the Stalinists there is always the absurdity
and the irony that emanates from their alternative universe where everything is
the opposite of what they say. This “equality” constitutionally guaranteed as
“an indefeasible law” was drafted and promulgated during the very time when the
grey tunic wearing General Secretary of the CPSU, dedicated to advancing the
well being of the toiling masses (the “most vulnerable members” of society as
the SPLC would put it) was practicing his unique version of “hatred and contempt” with the staged
show trials of his old Bolshevik compatriots and a behind the scenes massive
political purge that sent hundreds of thousands to the Gulag and slaughtered
many thousands more.
Contemporary
Stalinists like the ones who run the SPLC have imitated their predecessors and
perfected a style of propaganda that disguises their goal, the destruction of
political opposition, by intensively moralizing their self-image with the
language of compassion and fairness and, conversely, demonizing the face and personality
of the opposition. The moralized Stalinist
of the 1930s was a little-guy-champion, anti-Fascist,
an image designed to make him always come out the winner in the game of “which
side are you on?” Even better, “Fascism” was, and still is, an
expandable-contractible sort of label, easily adjusted to fit whomever and
whenever the occasion demanded. The twenty-first century moralized Stalinist of
the SPLC ilk is an anti-racist, which
means, if he doesn’t like you, then well … forget the groveling and
self-criticism Chinese Cultural Revolution style. It does no good. You have to join that other camp of the
properly shunned, that “basket of
deplorables”. “Racism” like its
cousin “Fascism” has a similar flexibility which makes it suitable for
attachment to those disagreeable sorts far and wide.
“Hatred”
is one of a number of popular resorted to slurs in the left’s agitprop
lexicon. It joins “Fascist” “Nazi”,
“Racist”, all words that rely heavily on the imagery of Europe in the 1930s –
Mussolini’s Italy, Franco’s Spain and, of course, Hitler’s Germany. How ironic is it that today’s “progressives”
like Barack Obama who claim to see in history an “arc that bends toward justice”
have constructed a stark, historically frozen moral universe where Hitler never
really dies – he just perpetually reappears with broad support in contemporary
incarnations, for the moment, Donald Trump – and where they cannot conceive of
themselves as anything other than the moral obverse of the Brown Shirts and
goose-steppers? Of course, the more
morally repugnant and malignant your opposition, the greater by contrast the
glow of your own goodness and virtue.
Without Nazis to fall back on, the moralism of todays progressives would
go poof.
With
the frenzied and indiscriminate attachment of “hatred” to its critics, the left
exhibits its grossest defects, its rank hypocrisy and incapacity for critical
self-reflection. The unprecedented outpouring
of contempt by the left for Donald Trump and the sixty-two million Americans
who voted for him suggests that the hatred so eagerly attributed to so many
others is a projection of their own hatred and loathing to which they are astonishingly
oblivious.
There
is, finally, as we see in Proverbs
(above) a “righteous” hatred, the hatred of a just God for wickedness – lying, the
killing of innocents, vanity and deceit -- all deserved to be hated. But this is not the hatred that the left
rails against. Hatred for them is completely and ultimately political,
something that is only found on the right, something somehow that they themselves
in all their rectitude never experience. This approach of turning your critics
into deeply immoral, “irredeemable” people enables the left to advance even
further toward what they seek, a complete monopoly of power. Hatred then as a political weapon achieves
its perfection when it moves from de-moralizing the opposition to its full
criminalization -- hate crimes. With the criminalization of hate, the full,
unimpeded power of the state can be brought to bear on unpopular thinking and
speech. No competition allowed: the monopoly is complete. Hate crime laws have paralyzed the right in
Europe and Canada and cowed their populations.
Hillary Clinton’s unexpected derailment has only delayed the coming tsunami. Get ready.
Comments (25)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
"Obama is a man of the left and the left hates guns more than almost anything else they remotely associate with the despised right, more than gas guzzlers, home school families, coal companies, confederate flags or pro-life protestors."
Fuck that bi-sexual deviant, communist nigger, that abomination who illegally occupied the Oval Office and disgraced this country for two-terms by this very fact.
Pardon my Yiddish.
Fuck that bi-sexual deviant, communist nigger, that abomination who illegally occupied the Oval Office and disgraced this country for two-terms by this very fact.
Pardon my Yiddish.
Black families were imported to Detroit as strike breakers to cross the picket line, when white men stood up on their hind legs and demanded to be treated equitably. Blacks were the useful idiots to help keep a lid on trade unions.
Blacks still play the fool, until it's time to play the rent a thug mob, to shake down productive citizens for the share of the FREE Gibs Me Dats!
Blacks still play the fool, until it's time to play the rent a thug mob, to shake down productive citizens for the share of the FREE Gibs Me Dats!
I do not believe racism is in any DNA, nor do I believe that President Obama knew or knows much about anything he talked or is talking about. Racism is not inherited. If you don't believe racism is learned, watch for awhile two little kids of different races playing with each other.
Dr. Rand Paul cites two studies about masks, both of which debunk the myth of the efficacy of masks in preventing the spread of Coronavirus. Just today, New York released their tracking data (another imperialistic tool used for controlling the masses) on the spread of Coronavirus in restaurants. It was 1.4%! Cuomo still ordered all restaurants and bars to close. I am quite sure there are few trustworthy corporations anymore, but my situation (older, some autoimmune disease) seems to compel me to make a voluntary choice and get the vaccine as soon as I can, even though I am fine so far. I go out a lot to church, some social gatherings, shopping, etc., but I take common-sense precautions used to prevent the spread of any virus. The Health Dictatorship, as Foster labels it, has got to be overthrown, otherwise the backbones of our economy and freedom, i.e., small businesses, will be destroyed. But perhaps that is, after all, the plan of the left!
By the way, Foster's new novel, Toward The Bad I Kept On Turning, is a great read. Though somewhat fantastical, it is chocked full of great stories and a lot of history. It is available on Amazon.
By the way, Foster's new novel, Toward The Bad I Kept On Turning, is a great read. Though somewhat fantastical, it is chocked full of great stories and a lot of history. It is available on Amazon.
Yeah, you can be a "racist" just by existing, without even thinking in "racist" terms or having "racist" motives. And if you simply want to state facts or have a conversation about racism, you will become a threat to the control aficionados, and will become racist by default. As foster suggests, if you're not part of the collective, you're not legitimate. And about diversity; is the "salad bowl" philosophy better than the old "melting pot" descriptor? No, not when speaking of nationalism. And the extremes to which the salad bowl philosophy have been taken certainly do not, as the Wokes claim, insure personal liberty. Just the opposite as diversity becomes groupthink!
Donald Trump's time is over! House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer have jointly asked Vice President Mike Pence to trigger Amendment No. 25 to dismiss President Trump.
What would anyone expect from far-left politicians like Pelosi and Schumer who, instead of preparing for the confirmation hearings for Biden's cabinet picks, would waste their time on this nonsense.
Foster has, once again, "hit the nail on the head." However, in my opinion, if the Democrats try to confiscate guns anywhere in this country, all hell will break loose!
They might not be so obvious about it. More likely they'll declare the manufacture of ammunition a contributor to global warming and order a halt to production.
When we visited Munich some years ago we decided to visit Dachau. The locals would not tell us how to get there or even admit of its existence. Nazification had indeed been accomplished, and continued even then. Now, here, we deplorables with our guns and God are being cancelled in much the same way. Those of you who doubt, make no mistake; gun control laws, including gun confiscation laws, will immediately increase as a first step, followed closely or even simultaneously by the attempt by the Democrats to once and for all institute an absolute right to practice their religion of abortion without limits. Wake up people. Foster is right. If we continue down the path of American denazification by altering our country's history through false and improper education and untrustworthy news, and if we do not expose the myth of "systemic" racism, our country, and all of its good people, will be totally ruled by and dependent on government. Is that what "the land of the free" is all about?
I didn't watch the inauguration because I was too busy doing more important things, so I can't comment first-hand on it. But from what I've seen and read about it, there were two differing observations. The conservative-leaning pundits and news media agreed with the assessment penned by Foster; the liberal news media thought it was "the best inauguration speech ever." Given the fact that it appears it was read verbatim from the teleprompter with no deviations, it obviously was not penned by Biden. It purportedly invoked religion and God more than any inauguration speech since Eisenhower. And this stuff was spouted by a man who represents a party whose religion is abortion! The best inauguration speech ever? Really? C'mon man!
Yes, millions can and have seen that Democracy has not prevailed. When the people turn over their power to the Washington Establishment, bolstered by a complicit mainstream media, only tyranny can result. Are we there yet?
The state should not be able to force people to give up the fundamental right to control over their own bodies unless exercising that right can be shown to be dangerous or detrimental to other people who also have the right to life. Abortion is an example; it's hard to argue that having an abortion is not really, really detrimental to another human life. The same can be true for vaccinations; if herd immunity is vitally important to the lives of everybody, then people can be forced to comply.
Another great blog from Stephen Foster. I religiously follow his blog, and though I sometimes disagree with him (see above) , I am never disappointed with his great thought processes, knowledge, and perfect-sense (usually) arguments and observations. This present blog is no exception: well-written and well- thought-out. I too, was a professor, and I share many of his experiences with the new "Studies curricula" and the problems and even downright horrors they brought and continue to bring. The cancel culture is, I believe, largely a product of the indoctrination graduates of these largely worthless grievance vocabulary majors have received and promulgated. Certainly the cancel culture has not made our lives happier, safer, nor more productive, as Foster points out by way of the rhetorical questions he asks at the end of the blog!
The New Normal will never be what I (and Foster, obviously) will ever accept. Even given our country's stated "rules of law," I fear people will have to get hurt before we jump over the cuckoo's nest.
There's that word "diversity" again popping up all over academia The results of invoking and then acting on the word in universities is mostly bull crap! I'm OK with you being diverse, as long as you don't mind me being diverse in different ways than you, and neither of us cause harm to each other or to others that are diverse from us. As famous Los Angeles actor Rodney King
once said, "Why can't we all just get along?
once said, "Why can't we all just get along?
Foster's recent post is ominous, predicting that our "democracy" is rapidly heading toward Marxism. Unfortunately, this is probably true. And yes, there is hope in resistance, but it may take much more than words and thoughts and is very scary to those of us who love our country!
From above: "Perceptions and opinions, as we know, tend to be error-prone, subjectively based, tendentious, and, at times held with fanatical fervor in the face of disconfirming, empirically-based reality." Very true. People's feelings often take precedence over facts, many times based on their own biases and observations and being convinced by a corrupt media that continually bombards them with confirming claptrap. But pretentious and insincere statements are often not true in the real world, and the failure of many to grasp that, either because of ignorance or because of willful denial, leads to failure, sometimes cataclysmic failure, of societies. Woke? I think not. Deceived? Absolutely!
It seems that our whole culture - or counter-culture now - has become one big abstraction. Though Foster makes the point, convincingly, I think, that we can't really declare war on an abstraction, perhaps we should do just that with the goal of quickly winning that war and getting back, as a new normal, to things that really matter to us.
I think the whole premise of "Hitler" returning has to do with the fear of the Washington D.C. politicians that the swamp will be drained and, thus, power lost. That can't be allowed to happen, so new Hitlers are discovered to take the focus off of the massive failures, avarice, and dishonesty practiced by the swamp creatures. For example, when Trump was elected, he had to be made a Hitler. His populist ideas and promises made could not be allowed to stand. And even though Trump accomplished a lot and kept a lot of promises, he had to be maligned even if it meant that the country would suffer. The mainstream news organizations were willing co-conspirators in this endeavor, and even now conspire to cover up the obvious and severe shortfalls of the new President. As a wise character named Pogo once said, "We have met the enemy, and he is us."
According to those on the left, everything white people do is racist. But, as Foster points out, nothing people of color do can possibly be racist. Astonishingly, we now have racist highways that were perpetrated on people of color by white people. But it should be apparent to all that the mainstream media, illustrated by what they say and how they say (or don't say) it, are definitely racist themselves. Racially-incited hatred from virtually every leftist group now, is becoming rampant, and we must find the truth-telling to end it! Thanks Stephen, for your truth telling.
Foster's newest blog, Moscow to Minneapolis, is not only true, but is "right on" in every respect. This is an absolutely great blog. And of course, as always, Foster makes his points so well with his mastery of the written word.
How did we (The citizens of the United States) get to this point of "collective madness" where we allow "Critical Race Theory" to not only explain everything but explain away everything not deemed desirable by so few?" Whatever happened to embracing critique and disagreement and civil discourse?
When, exactly, did the fourth estate morph almost completely into the fifth column and become the propaganda arm of the fictional systemic racism believers?
How did we (The citizens of the United States) get to this point of "collective madness" where we allow "Critical Race Theory" to not only explain everything but explain away everything not deemed desirable by so few?" Whatever happened to embracing critique and disagreement and civil discourse?
When, exactly, did the fourth estate morph almost completely into the fifth column and become the propaganda arm of the fictional systemic racism believers?
Why can't we all just get along? - Rodney King Possibly because there are many, usually on one side of the Black vs. White conflict, who prefer not to do so. Rather, they prefer to manufacture their own justice, whether it fits the facts or not.
This last blog about embalmed former "leaders" was interesting and readable. As I read it and the reference to Biden, I began to wonder if dementia could be compared to a kind of premature embalming. Surely Biden's present thought processes are little better than those that would come from a preserved corpse. And if Dr. Jill was not around to lead him out of his wandering ways and otherwise direct him, would old Joe be able to get through any day without being compared to an animated yet relatively mindless decedent? Which begs the question, did thinking people really vote for him? And, if so, can they succinctly explain why other than because they "hated" Trump?
Comments by IntenseDebate
Posting anonymously.
Labels:
Barack Obama,
basket of deplorables,
Communist Relics,
Donald Trump,
Hate crimes,
hate speech,
Hillary Clinton,
Joseph Stalin,
Muslims,
Orlando Massacre,
Southern Poverty Law Center,
Stalinism
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment