Commentary on Communist history and ideology with comparisons to other Totalitarian ideologies and movements. Also links contemporary political events to ideological themes and trends.
Friday, October 21, 2011
Stalin & Mao -- Public Works
The Kingdome of Darknesse…is nothing else but a confederacy of Deceivers, that to obtain dominion over men in this present world, endeavour by dark, and erroneous Doctrines, to extinguish them in the Light, both of Nature, and of the Gospel.
Thomas Hobbes
Stalin and Mao during their long dictatorships remained obsessed with massive public works projects that they believed would grandly visualize both the glory and superiority of Communism as well as permanently establish and memorialize their own personal genius. The public works obsessions of both of these men were put into practice and resulted not only in an astonishing and specular squandering of resources and a devastation of the environment, but the senseless death, injury and exhaustion of tens of thousands of people. When the work was finished and the workers dead or physically wasted and disabled, the projects themselves were resounding failures, glaring monstrosities of stupidity, waste and incompetence.
Stalin like Lenin and Marx had no practical experience of work in either a factory or a farm. The Bolsheviks until they came to power had never planned, managed or produced anything. They were utopian speculators and pontificators with few practical skills or technical knowledge, no managerial or administrative expertise and no governing experience. But above all they were angry and unhappy, animated by an intense loathing for the social structure they aimed to dismantle and were especially hostile to individuals with recognized skills and expertise, those who had made the “corrupt” order work. Stalin himself had never made or built anything with his hands. He never established any actual lasting connections with people who did real physical labor, who worked in the factories, who mined, fished, farmed, logged – none of these people did the Champion of the working class come in any significant way to know, esteem or engage. He was surrounded by people like him, professional revolutionaries who had come to power with neither practical nor administrative experience. After 1928 writes Martin Malia, “Stalin never visited rural Russia again. Throughout the whole collectivization drive, in fact to the end of his days, he never inspected a Red kolkhoz.” [Malia, The Soviet Tragedy: A History of Socialism in Russia, 1917-1991, New York, 1994, 194]
Stalin’s complete lack of engineering, geological or commercial knowledge and experience was never an inhibition to the projects he would plan and order. He conceived and ordered the construction of the White Sea Canal to connect the cold water of the White Sea to the commercial ports of the Baltic. The high cost and even the question of the necessity of the entire project (140 miles of digging with five damns and nineteen locks) were dismissed by Stalin as irrelevant. Paying for it, of course, posed no problem for him. He used slaves, that is, Soviet citizens most of whom were arbitrarily arrested, and forced to do the work with an impossibly accelerated schedule (20 months), minimal surveying and engineering preparation, and primitive tools – hand digging, horses and wheel barrows. [Anne Applebaum, Gulag, a History, New York, 2004, 62-64]. Over 25,000 workers, in this new society planned and governed by ideologues who loudly claimed to rule on behalf of the workers, died through the course of the worthless project. The White Sea Canal project was not and had never been necessary and, with its too shallow waterways and the rail alternatives, turned out to be almost completely useless as a commercial waterway or for anything else. There was never any good reason to build it. It fell eventually into permanent disuse and decay. These massive projects were always trumpeted with great fanfare by the organs of state propaganda and presented by the party as colossal achievements. Sycophancy trumped reality and no effort was spared to present these projects as spectacular accomplishments of the new Socialist man. Stalin enlisted the illustrious writer Maxim Gorky to edit the White Sea—Baltic Canal a laudatory compilation of lies of 120 Soviet writers. [Martin, Amis, Koba the Dread: Laughter and the Twenty Million, New York, 2003, 227]
Stalin in the 1930s elevated the ignoramus and quack agronomist, Trofim Lysenko, to a dictatorship over Soviet biological science. With his ideological assault on modern biology and genetics, Lysenko set back Soviet agriculture 30 years. Lysenko’s notions of acquired characteristics as applied to agronomy and horticulture appealed to Stalin because they were more in keeping with his Marxist view that the alteration of environmental conditions could produce rapid positive ameliorations. Lysenko and his acolytes used their proximity to Stalin and the favor he bestowed upon them to abuse and vilify real scientists and capable technicians. Khrushchev also fell under the spell of Lysenko and let him implement vast experiments that were disastrous for Soviet agriculture and were in part responsible for his own fall from power in 1964.
Mao following, following Stalin’s lead, imported Lysenkoism into China with the same ideological obtuseness and producing the same practical wreckage. Mao forced science like everything else he attempted to manage into his own crudely fashioned Marxist centerpiece themes. “Lysenko’s theories meshed perfectly with Mao’s obsession with class struggle. He readily believed that plants from the same ‘class’ would never compete against each other for good or light. While the Chinese Communists were still in Yanan, the chief Chinese Lysenkoist, Luo Tianyu, propagated the Soviet teachings: and in the 1942 rectification movement, a purge of Party members, Luo enthusiastically persecuted those who believed in genetics.” [Jasper Becker, Hungry Ghosts: Mao’s Secret Famine, New York, 1998, 68] Genetics in China was banned because it conflicted with Mao’s Marxist-grounded “wisdom.” Inherited diseases, like sickle cell anemia thus could not exist in the Chinese Communist world. [Jasper, Hungry Ghosts, 69]
As Mao launched the Great Leap Forward with his customary modesty he thundered that “there is a new war: we should open fire on nature.” [Frank Dikotter, Mao's Great Famine: The History of China’s Most Devastating Catastrophe, 1958-1962, New York, 2011 174] Nature, like people, was simply for Mao another temporary obstacle that would bend to his will and yield to the application of massive force so as to become part of the new restructured reality, a monument to his wisdom. Again, a man with no scientific, engineering or technical knowledge of any kind would plan and dictate the most wide sweeping projects and policies related to agriculture, dams, and other massive public works projects. Dikotter writes that “throughout the country [China] country dams and canals, built by hundreds of millions of farmers at great human and economic costs, were for the greatest part rendered useless or even dangerous, resulting in landslides, river silting, soil salinisation and devastating inundation.” [Dikotter, Mao’s Great Famine, xii] Mao’s Three Gate Gorge project, like Stalin’s White Sea Canal, was an extravaganza of hubris, folly and destruction, the end result a useless waste of people and a ruined piece of nature. “The project was officially launched in April 1957, despite the reservation of several hydraulic engineers…. By the end of 1958 the Yellow River was blocked. Some 6 million square metres of earth had been moved in a pharaonic enterprise involving the labor of tens of thousands of villagers… By 1961 the amount of silt carried by the Yellow River had doubled…. Up to 95 per cent of the Yellow River west of Zhengshou was mud. A few years later the area was so silted up that foreigners were banned from visiting the dam.” [Dikotter, Mao’s Great Famine, 26] The price for this combination of ignorance and arrogance was paid for not by Mao and his sycophants but by the Chinese people who lived daily with the destruction and had endured the false propaganda of its success.
Comments (25)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
"Obama is a man of the left and the left hates guns more than almost anything else they remotely associate with the despised right, more than gas guzzlers, home school families, coal companies, confederate flags or pro-life protestors."
Fuck that bi-sexual deviant, communist nigger, that abomination who illegally occupied the Oval Office and disgraced this country for two-terms by this very fact.
Pardon my Yiddish.
Fuck that bi-sexual deviant, communist nigger, that abomination who illegally occupied the Oval Office and disgraced this country for two-terms by this very fact.
Pardon my Yiddish.
Black families were imported to Detroit as strike breakers to cross the picket line, when white men stood up on their hind legs and demanded to be treated equitably. Blacks were the useful idiots to help keep a lid on trade unions.
Blacks still play the fool, until it's time to play the rent a thug mob, to shake down productive citizens for the share of the FREE Gibs Me Dats!
Blacks still play the fool, until it's time to play the rent a thug mob, to shake down productive citizens for the share of the FREE Gibs Me Dats!
I do not believe racism is in any DNA, nor do I believe that President Obama knew or knows much about anything he talked or is talking about. Racism is not inherited. If you don't believe racism is learned, watch for awhile two little kids of different races playing with each other.
Dr. Rand Paul cites two studies about masks, both of which debunk the myth of the efficacy of masks in preventing the spread of Coronavirus. Just today, New York released their tracking data (another imperialistic tool used for controlling the masses) on the spread of Coronavirus in restaurants. It was 1.4%! Cuomo still ordered all restaurants and bars to close. I am quite sure there are few trustworthy corporations anymore, but my situation (older, some autoimmune disease) seems to compel me to make a voluntary choice and get the vaccine as soon as I can, even though I am fine so far. I go out a lot to church, some social gatherings, shopping, etc., but I take common-sense precautions used to prevent the spread of any virus. The Health Dictatorship, as Foster labels it, has got to be overthrown, otherwise the backbones of our economy and freedom, i.e., small businesses, will be destroyed. But perhaps that is, after all, the plan of the left!
By the way, Foster's new novel, Toward The Bad I Kept On Turning, is a great read. Though somewhat fantastical, it is chocked full of great stories and a lot of history. It is available on Amazon.
By the way, Foster's new novel, Toward The Bad I Kept On Turning, is a great read. Though somewhat fantastical, it is chocked full of great stories and a lot of history. It is available on Amazon.
Yeah, you can be a "racist" just by existing, without even thinking in "racist" terms or having "racist" motives. And if you simply want to state facts or have a conversation about racism, you will become a threat to the control aficionados, and will become racist by default. As foster suggests, if you're not part of the collective, you're not legitimate. And about diversity; is the "salad bowl" philosophy better than the old "melting pot" descriptor? No, not when speaking of nationalism. And the extremes to which the salad bowl philosophy have been taken certainly do not, as the Wokes claim, insure personal liberty. Just the opposite as diversity becomes groupthink!
Donald Trump's time is over! House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer have jointly asked Vice President Mike Pence to trigger Amendment No. 25 to dismiss President Trump.
What would anyone expect from far-left politicians like Pelosi and Schumer who, instead of preparing for the confirmation hearings for Biden's cabinet picks, would waste their time on this nonsense.
Foster has, once again, "hit the nail on the head." However, in my opinion, if the Democrats try to confiscate guns anywhere in this country, all hell will break loose!
They might not be so obvious about it. More likely they'll declare the manufacture of ammunition a contributor to global warming and order a halt to production.
When we visited Munich some years ago we decided to visit Dachau. The locals would not tell us how to get there or even admit of its existence. Nazification had indeed been accomplished, and continued even then. Now, here, we deplorables with our guns and God are being cancelled in much the same way. Those of you who doubt, make no mistake; gun control laws, including gun confiscation laws, will immediately increase as a first step, followed closely or even simultaneously by the attempt by the Democrats to once and for all institute an absolute right to practice their religion of abortion without limits. Wake up people. Foster is right. If we continue down the path of American denazification by altering our country's history through false and improper education and untrustworthy news, and if we do not expose the myth of "systemic" racism, our country, and all of its good people, will be totally ruled by and dependent on government. Is that what "the land of the free" is all about?
I didn't watch the inauguration because I was too busy doing more important things, so I can't comment first-hand on it. But from what I've seen and read about it, there were two differing observations. The conservative-leaning pundits and news media agreed with the assessment penned by Foster; the liberal news media thought it was "the best inauguration speech ever." Given the fact that it appears it was read verbatim from the teleprompter with no deviations, it obviously was not penned by Biden. It purportedly invoked religion and God more than any inauguration speech since Eisenhower. And this stuff was spouted by a man who represents a party whose religion is abortion! The best inauguration speech ever? Really? C'mon man!
Yes, millions can and have seen that Democracy has not prevailed. When the people turn over their power to the Washington Establishment, bolstered by a complicit mainstream media, only tyranny can result. Are we there yet?
The state should not be able to force people to give up the fundamental right to control over their own bodies unless exercising that right can be shown to be dangerous or detrimental to other people who also have the right to life. Abortion is an example; it's hard to argue that having an abortion is not really, really detrimental to another human life. The same can be true for vaccinations; if herd immunity is vitally important to the lives of everybody, then people can be forced to comply.
Another great blog from Stephen Foster. I religiously follow his blog, and though I sometimes disagree with him (see above) , I am never disappointed with his great thought processes, knowledge, and perfect-sense (usually) arguments and observations. This present blog is no exception: well-written and well- thought-out. I too, was a professor, and I share many of his experiences with the new "Studies curricula" and the problems and even downright horrors they brought and continue to bring. The cancel culture is, I believe, largely a product of the indoctrination graduates of these largely worthless grievance vocabulary majors have received and promulgated. Certainly the cancel culture has not made our lives happier, safer, nor more productive, as Foster points out by way of the rhetorical questions he asks at the end of the blog!
The New Normal will never be what I (and Foster, obviously) will ever accept. Even given our country's stated "rules of law," I fear people will have to get hurt before we jump over the cuckoo's nest.
There's that word "diversity" again popping up all over academia The results of invoking and then acting on the word in universities is mostly bull crap! I'm OK with you being diverse, as long as you don't mind me being diverse in different ways than you, and neither of us cause harm to each other or to others that are diverse from us. As famous Los Angeles actor Rodney King
once said, "Why can't we all just get along?
once said, "Why can't we all just get along?
Foster's recent post is ominous, predicting that our "democracy" is rapidly heading toward Marxism. Unfortunately, this is probably true. And yes, there is hope in resistance, but it may take much more than words and thoughts and is very scary to those of us who love our country!
From above: "Perceptions and opinions, as we know, tend to be error-prone, subjectively based, tendentious, and, at times held with fanatical fervor in the face of disconfirming, empirically-based reality." Very true. People's feelings often take precedence over facts, many times based on their own biases and observations and being convinced by a corrupt media that continually bombards them with confirming claptrap. But pretentious and insincere statements are often not true in the real world, and the failure of many to grasp that, either because of ignorance or because of willful denial, leads to failure, sometimes cataclysmic failure, of societies. Woke? I think not. Deceived? Absolutely!
It seems that our whole culture - or counter-culture now - has become one big abstraction. Though Foster makes the point, convincingly, I think, that we can't really declare war on an abstraction, perhaps we should do just that with the goal of quickly winning that war and getting back, as a new normal, to things that really matter to us.
I think the whole premise of "Hitler" returning has to do with the fear of the Washington D.C. politicians that the swamp will be drained and, thus, power lost. That can't be allowed to happen, so new Hitlers are discovered to take the focus off of the massive failures, avarice, and dishonesty practiced by the swamp creatures. For example, when Trump was elected, he had to be made a Hitler. His populist ideas and promises made could not be allowed to stand. And even though Trump accomplished a lot and kept a lot of promises, he had to be maligned even if it meant that the country would suffer. The mainstream news organizations were willing co-conspirators in this endeavor, and even now conspire to cover up the obvious and severe shortfalls of the new President. As a wise character named Pogo once said, "We have met the enemy, and he is us."
According to those on the left, everything white people do is racist. But, as Foster points out, nothing people of color do can possibly be racist. Astonishingly, we now have racist highways that were perpetrated on people of color by white people. But it should be apparent to all that the mainstream media, illustrated by what they say and how they say (or don't say) it, are definitely racist themselves. Racially-incited hatred from virtually every leftist group now, is becoming rampant, and we must find the truth-telling to end it! Thanks Stephen, for your truth telling.
Foster's newest blog, Moscow to Minneapolis, is not only true, but is "right on" in every respect. This is an absolutely great blog. And of course, as always, Foster makes his points so well with his mastery of the written word.
How did we (The citizens of the United States) get to this point of "collective madness" where we allow "Critical Race Theory" to not only explain everything but explain away everything not deemed desirable by so few?" Whatever happened to embracing critique and disagreement and civil discourse?
When, exactly, did the fourth estate morph almost completely into the fifth column and become the propaganda arm of the fictional systemic racism believers?
How did we (The citizens of the United States) get to this point of "collective madness" where we allow "Critical Race Theory" to not only explain everything but explain away everything not deemed desirable by so few?" Whatever happened to embracing critique and disagreement and civil discourse?
When, exactly, did the fourth estate morph almost completely into the fifth column and become the propaganda arm of the fictional systemic racism believers?
Why can't we all just get along? - Rodney King Possibly because there are many, usually on one side of the Black vs. White conflict, who prefer not to do so. Rather, they prefer to manufacture their own justice, whether it fits the facts or not.
This last blog about embalmed former "leaders" was interesting and readable. As I read it and the reference to Biden, I began to wonder if dementia could be compared to a kind of premature embalming. Surely Biden's present thought processes are little better than those that would come from a preserved corpse. And if Dr. Jill was not around to lead him out of his wandering ways and otherwise direct him, would old Joe be able to get through any day without being compared to an animated yet relatively mindless decedent? Which begs the question, did thinking people really vote for him? And, if so, can they succinctly explain why other than because they "hated" Trump?
Comments by IntenseDebate
Posting anonymously.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment