Commentary on Communist history and ideology with comparisons to other Totalitarian ideologies and movements. Also links contemporary political events to ideological themes and trends.
Sunday, August 2, 2015
Why the Left Hates Guns
“President Obama says the biggest frustration of his
tenure is the lack of new gun control laws.”
USA Today, July 24th, 2015
Unlike most of
the President Obama’s declarations – “If you like your doctor, you can keep
your doctor”, for example – this one, above, was true. You
could believe him for once. Obama always hated guns and if it had been in his power
he would have confiscated every firearm in the country down to the last BB gun,
except for those carried by the Secret Service detail that continues to protect him and his
family.
Obama is a man
of the left and the left hates guns more than almost anything else they
remotely associate with the despised right, more than gas guzzlers, home school
families, coal companies, confederate flags or pro-life protestors. Just the
mention of the NRA will trigger spasms of fury and outpourings of disgust from
a leftist. The NRA for them is evil incarnate. No other organization is likely
more detested.
What is it
about guns that make people on the left hate them so much and harbor so much
contempt for those people – not so much the criminals who use them, but the
ordinary, law-abiding people who insist on owning them?
Begin with the
basics: a gun is an amazing instrument
of power. A ninety pound woman physically confronted by a two hundred pound man
with a BMI of 25 has little power to resist his assault or aggression. A gun in her hand completely changes the
power equation. Sans gun by virtue of
his superior size and relative strength, the man can seriously injure or even
kill the woman. It happens. With the gun
she can easily kill him if he attempts to harm her. This does not happen often
enough. The right person in this scenario takes the ride to the morgue. His
advantage-conveying, extra 110 pounds and bigger bones and muscles are
nullified by the discharge from her 25 ounce Ruger.
Guns enforce power-relations which is why
police and soldiers carry them. Guns also can change power-relations which is why so many people want them both for
reasons legitimate and some not so much. The left wants to take away guns (primarily those of the “bitter clingers”) so as to render them powerless.
The left would
love to confiscate all the guns in this country claiming that it would end gun
violence. This is idiotic on the face of it. Criminalize the possession of something in high
demand and relatively easy to produce and you will see a dramatic spike in its price
because of the seller’s criminal risk. High prices attract high-risk entrepreneurs (aggressive young men usually) into the marketplace who form
powerful, sophisticated crime syndicates that are (a) very competitive and
hence extremely violent and (b) cater successfully to vast markets for their
illegal product. The massive infusion of drugs into the U.S. with the
accompanying violence dramatically illustrates how the unintended consequences
of firearm confiscation, if attempted, would unfold. Government confiscation of guns would drastically
increase (criminalized) gun ownership and vastly increase gun violence, not to
mention the exhaustion of law enforcement resources and the complete political
alienation of large numbers of American citizens.
The loathing
of the left for guns in part comes from their jealousy of power. Guns are
highly-charged symbols as well as practical instruments of power, and power,
they believe, belongs exclusively to them. This is not just about what guns can
do. It is about what they symbolize – individualism,
independence and self-sufficiency – for the collectivist, regulation-loving, control-obsessed
left, anathemas.
The thinking
on the left goes something like this: because we are compassionate, smart, right-thinking
and destined by the progressive march of history to eradicate – pick your evil
– racism, sexism, homophobia, imperialism, global warming, we and we alone deserve
power. If not us, who? And, whatever we must do to get it and keep it
is fine because above all else we are well-intentioned and virtuous and if we
are not in charge, then it’s, well, “the other”, the corrupt and morally
benighted people who oppose us – racist,
bigoted, greedy, stupid, indifferent to the plight of the poor and unfortunate. Leftists neither practice nor believe in loyal
opposition: for the opposition they have only contempt.
Gun ownership
confers power and thus just the suggestion that people might legitimately arm
themselves constitutes an encroachment on the left’s perceived prerogative and
arouses their jealousy and outrage.
People, they groan, do not neeeeeed
guns! They know what people need and don’t need and are clearly annoyed that
the unenlightened rubes who live outside of the civilized regions of Manhattan,
San Francisco, Washington, DC and Madison, Wisconsin cannot grasp this obvious
truth.
Self-defense,
they sneeringly dismiss as a legitimate reason to own a gun – that is what the
State is for. Try not to choke on the
hypocrisy. They are protected 24x7 by
armed secret service personnel (Obama and his family) or live in safe, posh
suburbs with expensive, sophisticated security systems and reliable, predicable
police protection. But for those “folks” for whom they have so much compassion
and about whom they know so little, those folks who have to worry about the
muggers, rapists, wife-batterers, drug peddlers and strung out junkies who
populate their neighborhoods? Well, they are supposed to cherish how virtuous they
will feel without those awful guns they don’t need and hope a cop might show up
before someone in the family gets raped or murdered. We all know that there are
large sections of some of the cities in the U.S. (governed by anti-gun Democrat
politicians) where the police reluctantly go. The State is quite selective in
the protection it provides for its citizens. The “State” for the “ruled-over”
is a useless abstraction and the pervasive cynicism and skepticism now aimed at
those who operate it are completely justified.
These “public servants” enjoy all of the perks of their offices that the
rest of us only envy. (“Last Friday,
[Hillary] Clinton flew to Bergdorf Goodman in New York, where the stylist
at the salon gives $600 haircuts. The department store was locked down for
her.” http://thehill.com/opinion/ab-stoddard/249734-ab-stoddard-clinton-must-be-joking)
Our political class betters make onerous rules for their inferiors to live under, but
not for themselves. At election time these vultures descend from their comfortable,
lofty perches to perform tedious rituals of pretending to care when what they
really want is just more power and the advantages and privileges that come with
it.
The animosity
of the left for guns is also about the special kind of snobbery they indulge
that relates to the work they do and the way they live. They tend to work in
the realm of ideas and at activities intended to influence the thinking and
actions of others. They teach in schools
and universities, run media outlets and newspapers, manage and administer
organizations, market and sell products, process paper in government offices.
Some of them are “grievance specialists” at universities and other
organizations, professional busybodies and scolds who operate under the rubric
of “diversity”, a code word that permits them to hector and bully whomever they
please. These types don’t change the oil in their own cars, fix things they own
when they break down, make or grow anything they use or consume. They pay “other people” to do things like
this, and they mostly look down on them.
These “other people” tend to like guns. They live and think
conservatively and work at jobs such as policemen, firemen, mechanics, truck
drivers, construction workers and run small businesses. They hunt, fish, bowl, fix
their own cars, go to church, take care of their grandparents, join the
military and do many other things that offend the sensibilities of the left. For the
Prius-driving, inequality-obsessed Sociology professor who campaigned for Obama,
the gun-toting policeman he loathes and execrates in his 101 classes could not respond
quickly enough to his summons when he thinks a burglar might be near.
The left will
never relinquish their hostility toward gun owners and never abandon their
efforts at gun control. “Gun control” is
a euphemism, an essential piece of the larger picture that defines the essence
of the left and what they aspire to, complete control of others. Because they
believe themselves to be uniquely entitled to order and manage the lives of everybody,
they observe no restraints of honesty or fair play. Be assured, they will
relentlessly intrude themselves into every corner of our lives so as to make the rest of us
into what they think we should be, pale, inferior imitations of themselves. Guns are a huge obstacle to this goal. Viva
the cold dead fingers!
Comments (25)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
"Obama is a man of the left and the left hates guns more than almost anything else they remotely associate with the despised right, more than gas guzzlers, home school families, coal companies, confederate flags or pro-life protestors."
Fuck that bi-sexual deviant, communist nigger, that abomination who illegally occupied the Oval Office and disgraced this country for two-terms by this very fact.
Pardon my Yiddish.
Fuck that bi-sexual deviant, communist nigger, that abomination who illegally occupied the Oval Office and disgraced this country for two-terms by this very fact.
Pardon my Yiddish.
Black families were imported to Detroit as strike breakers to cross the picket line, when white men stood up on their hind legs and demanded to be treated equitably. Blacks were the useful idiots to help keep a lid on trade unions.
Blacks still play the fool, until it's time to play the rent a thug mob, to shake down productive citizens for the share of the FREE Gibs Me Dats!
Blacks still play the fool, until it's time to play the rent a thug mob, to shake down productive citizens for the share of the FREE Gibs Me Dats!
I do not believe racism is in any DNA, nor do I believe that President Obama knew or knows much about anything he talked or is talking about. Racism is not inherited. If you don't believe racism is learned, watch for awhile two little kids of different races playing with each other.
Dr. Rand Paul cites two studies about masks, both of which debunk the myth of the efficacy of masks in preventing the spread of Coronavirus. Just today, New York released their tracking data (another imperialistic tool used for controlling the masses) on the spread of Coronavirus in restaurants. It was 1.4%! Cuomo still ordered all restaurants and bars to close. I am quite sure there are few trustworthy corporations anymore, but my situation (older, some autoimmune disease) seems to compel me to make a voluntary choice and get the vaccine as soon as I can, even though I am fine so far. I go out a lot to church, some social gatherings, shopping, etc., but I take common-sense precautions used to prevent the spread of any virus. The Health Dictatorship, as Foster labels it, has got to be overthrown, otherwise the backbones of our economy and freedom, i.e., small businesses, will be destroyed. But perhaps that is, after all, the plan of the left!
By the way, Foster's new novel, Toward The Bad I Kept On Turning, is a great read. Though somewhat fantastical, it is chocked full of great stories and a lot of history. It is available on Amazon.
By the way, Foster's new novel, Toward The Bad I Kept On Turning, is a great read. Though somewhat fantastical, it is chocked full of great stories and a lot of history. It is available on Amazon.
Yeah, you can be a "racist" just by existing, without even thinking in "racist" terms or having "racist" motives. And if you simply want to state facts or have a conversation about racism, you will become a threat to the control aficionados, and will become racist by default. As foster suggests, if you're not part of the collective, you're not legitimate. And about diversity; is the "salad bowl" philosophy better than the old "melting pot" descriptor? No, not when speaking of nationalism. And the extremes to which the salad bowl philosophy have been taken certainly do not, as the Wokes claim, insure personal liberty. Just the opposite as diversity becomes groupthink!
Donald Trump's time is over! House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer have jointly asked Vice President Mike Pence to trigger Amendment No. 25 to dismiss President Trump.
What would anyone expect from far-left politicians like Pelosi and Schumer who, instead of preparing for the confirmation hearings for Biden's cabinet picks, would waste their time on this nonsense.
Foster has, once again, "hit the nail on the head." However, in my opinion, if the Democrats try to confiscate guns anywhere in this country, all hell will break loose!
They might not be so obvious about it. More likely they'll declare the manufacture of ammunition a contributor to global warming and order a halt to production.
When we visited Munich some years ago we decided to visit Dachau. The locals would not tell us how to get there or even admit of its existence. Nazification had indeed been accomplished, and continued even then. Now, here, we deplorables with our guns and God are being cancelled in much the same way. Those of you who doubt, make no mistake; gun control laws, including gun confiscation laws, will immediately increase as a first step, followed closely or even simultaneously by the attempt by the Democrats to once and for all institute an absolute right to practice their religion of abortion without limits. Wake up people. Foster is right. If we continue down the path of American denazification by altering our country's history through false and improper education and untrustworthy news, and if we do not expose the myth of "systemic" racism, our country, and all of its good people, will be totally ruled by and dependent on government. Is that what "the land of the free" is all about?
I didn't watch the inauguration because I was too busy doing more important things, so I can't comment first-hand on it. But from what I've seen and read about it, there were two differing observations. The conservative-leaning pundits and news media agreed with the assessment penned by Foster; the liberal news media thought it was "the best inauguration speech ever." Given the fact that it appears it was read verbatim from the teleprompter with no deviations, it obviously was not penned by Biden. It purportedly invoked religion and God more than any inauguration speech since Eisenhower. And this stuff was spouted by a man who represents a party whose religion is abortion! The best inauguration speech ever? Really? C'mon man!
Yes, millions can and have seen that Democracy has not prevailed. When the people turn over their power to the Washington Establishment, bolstered by a complicit mainstream media, only tyranny can result. Are we there yet?
The state should not be able to force people to give up the fundamental right to control over their own bodies unless exercising that right can be shown to be dangerous or detrimental to other people who also have the right to life. Abortion is an example; it's hard to argue that having an abortion is not really, really detrimental to another human life. The same can be true for vaccinations; if herd immunity is vitally important to the lives of everybody, then people can be forced to comply.
Another great blog from Stephen Foster. I religiously follow his blog, and though I sometimes disagree with him (see above) , I am never disappointed with his great thought processes, knowledge, and perfect-sense (usually) arguments and observations. This present blog is no exception: well-written and well- thought-out. I too, was a professor, and I share many of his experiences with the new "Studies curricula" and the problems and even downright horrors they brought and continue to bring. The cancel culture is, I believe, largely a product of the indoctrination graduates of these largely worthless grievance vocabulary majors have received and promulgated. Certainly the cancel culture has not made our lives happier, safer, nor more productive, as Foster points out by way of the rhetorical questions he asks at the end of the blog!
The New Normal will never be what I (and Foster, obviously) will ever accept. Even given our country's stated "rules of law," I fear people will have to get hurt before we jump over the cuckoo's nest.
There's that word "diversity" again popping up all over academia The results of invoking and then acting on the word in universities is mostly bull crap! I'm OK with you being diverse, as long as you don't mind me being diverse in different ways than you, and neither of us cause harm to each other or to others that are diverse from us. As famous Los Angeles actor Rodney King
once said, "Why can't we all just get along?
once said, "Why can't we all just get along?
Foster's recent post is ominous, predicting that our "democracy" is rapidly heading toward Marxism. Unfortunately, this is probably true. And yes, there is hope in resistance, but it may take much more than words and thoughts and is very scary to those of us who love our country!
From above: "Perceptions and opinions, as we know, tend to be error-prone, subjectively based, tendentious, and, at times held with fanatical fervor in the face of disconfirming, empirically-based reality." Very true. People's feelings often take precedence over facts, many times based on their own biases and observations and being convinced by a corrupt media that continually bombards them with confirming claptrap. But pretentious and insincere statements are often not true in the real world, and the failure of many to grasp that, either because of ignorance or because of willful denial, leads to failure, sometimes cataclysmic failure, of societies. Woke? I think not. Deceived? Absolutely!
It seems that our whole culture - or counter-culture now - has become one big abstraction. Though Foster makes the point, convincingly, I think, that we can't really declare war on an abstraction, perhaps we should do just that with the goal of quickly winning that war and getting back, as a new normal, to things that really matter to us.
I think the whole premise of "Hitler" returning has to do with the fear of the Washington D.C. politicians that the swamp will be drained and, thus, power lost. That can't be allowed to happen, so new Hitlers are discovered to take the focus off of the massive failures, avarice, and dishonesty practiced by the swamp creatures. For example, when Trump was elected, he had to be made a Hitler. His populist ideas and promises made could not be allowed to stand. And even though Trump accomplished a lot and kept a lot of promises, he had to be maligned even if it meant that the country would suffer. The mainstream news organizations were willing co-conspirators in this endeavor, and even now conspire to cover up the obvious and severe shortfalls of the new President. As a wise character named Pogo once said, "We have met the enemy, and he is us."
According to those on the left, everything white people do is racist. But, as Foster points out, nothing people of color do can possibly be racist. Astonishingly, we now have racist highways that were perpetrated on people of color by white people. But it should be apparent to all that the mainstream media, illustrated by what they say and how they say (or don't say) it, are definitely racist themselves. Racially-incited hatred from virtually every leftist group now, is becoming rampant, and we must find the truth-telling to end it! Thanks Stephen, for your truth telling.
Foster's newest blog, Moscow to Minneapolis, is not only true, but is "right on" in every respect. This is an absolutely great blog. And of course, as always, Foster makes his points so well with his mastery of the written word.
How did we (The citizens of the United States) get to this point of "collective madness" where we allow "Critical Race Theory" to not only explain everything but explain away everything not deemed desirable by so few?" Whatever happened to embracing critique and disagreement and civil discourse?
When, exactly, did the fourth estate morph almost completely into the fifth column and become the propaganda arm of the fictional systemic racism believers?
How did we (The citizens of the United States) get to this point of "collective madness" where we allow "Critical Race Theory" to not only explain everything but explain away everything not deemed desirable by so few?" Whatever happened to embracing critique and disagreement and civil discourse?
When, exactly, did the fourth estate morph almost completely into the fifth column and become the propaganda arm of the fictional systemic racism believers?
Why can't we all just get along? - Rodney King Possibly because there are many, usually on one side of the Black vs. White conflict, who prefer not to do so. Rather, they prefer to manufacture their own justice, whether it fits the facts or not.
This last blog about embalmed former "leaders" was interesting and readable. As I read it and the reference to Biden, I began to wonder if dementia could be compared to a kind of premature embalming. Surely Biden's present thought processes are little better than those that would come from a preserved corpse. And if Dr. Jill was not around to lead him out of his wandering ways and otherwise direct him, would old Joe be able to get through any day without being compared to an animated yet relatively mindless decedent? Which begs the question, did thinking people really vote for him? And, if so, can they succinctly explain why other than because they "hated" Trump?
Comments by IntenseDebate
Posting anonymously.
Labels:
Barack Obama,
Democrat Party,
Diversity,
Drug Traffic,
Global Warming,
Gun Control,
Hillary Clinton,
National Rifle Association,
NRA,
Prius,
Social Policy,
The Left
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment