Commentary on Communist history and ideology with comparisons to other Totalitarian ideologies and movements. Also links contemporary political events to ideological themes and trends.
Monday, June 18, 2012
The Reign of Resentment: Barack the Solipsist
Barack
Obama
Some of President Obama’s detractors think that he is a
Socialist. His supporters scorn the
notion. It is difficult
after reviewing much of what he has done, said and written to believe that he
is not. His autobiography and the
account of the authors he read and admired, his mentors, his actions as a
politician, suggest that he is. The Europeans still love him, and why not? He is one of their own, a dogmatic,
secularist statist, contemptuous of men and women who make their own way in the
world, even more disdainful of the red
state un-sophisticates who as he put it, “cling
to their guns or religion or antipathy to people who are not like them.” This
is a man whose world view expressed in his own words in Dreams from my Father is fundamentally shaped by alienation, resentment
and grievances. He came to see himself
as a man with an historic mission – to fix the grievances – the classic
Marxist.
Like all the great Marxist ideologues who find themselves
historically appointed to order other people’s lives, Obama apparently fancies
himself to be a genius, a man far above all others. Stalin was the “Great
Teacher,” Mao, the “Great Helmsman,”…. Obama
in 2008 became … “The One”, “the Change we seek.” He would in his own words, “heal the planet” and “fundamentally transform the United States of
America.” This is not the rhetoric of regular campaign politics, not the
typical blustering of an aspirant to high office. It unabashedly expresses the
fantasy of an egomaniac. The monumental energy and enthusiasm of his campaign came
not from his ideas or vision or achievements. There was no content beyond the candidate, personally
– his eloquence, intelligence and personality.
The 2008 campaign of Barack Obama was thus a huge
paradox – on the one hand it was all about HIM, his brilliance, his charisma,
his style, but at the same time he
was nothing (NO THING) that could be defined or described in a substantive,
empirical way. His complete lack of executive experience, scholarly,
intellectual depth and legislative accomplishment turned out to be an advantage,
a useful nothingness that let him be an alluring mirage, completely protean, a
wholesome, earnest, moderate, “pragmatist” who could charm the independent
voters disillusioned by George W. Bush, but at the same time let him play the role of a cerebral “activist,”
radical enough to enthrall the elite Leftwing stalwarts and the Hollywood
limo-set of his party who loath those Neanderthals who drive pickup trucks, go
to church and live in awful places like Texas, North Dakota and rural Indiana.
The Obama campaign was all about The Obama who managed to be everything
to everybody. Once elected, however, he could
not avoid revealing that his enthralling message of Hope and Change was smoke
and mirrors. Hope and Change could be
nothing other than nothing because nothing, after the fumes of his soaring
oratory dissipated, was what Obama was offering in the way of a better America.
Obama has always been exclusively about Obama. Every political office he has held was merely
a prelude to the next step up; his career a non-stop exercise of self-adulation
and self-promotion. Obama, one must
conclude, governs as he has lived, that is as a solipsist. The solipsist believes that the self can know nothing but its own
modifications and that the self is the only existent thing. Obama as our
leader has turned out to be that complete "Self"
undergoing the only modifications that matter, his own. He contemplates nothing
but his own self’s facets of perfection, preternaturally blind to certain intractable
features of a world outside of that Self that he will not and cannot comprehend.
Obama’s
solipsism should have been recognized during his campaign, not so much a
political campaign but rather the successful creation of a cult of personality. The personality cult is the culminating phase
of solipsistic rule where the number of courtiers who eagerly chime in a unison
voice to affirm the ruler’s wisdom and infallibility, reaches a critical mass. And
so it was. As Assistant Managing Editor of Newsweek, Evan Thomas announced on television to fellow Obama-worshiper,
Chris Matthews, Obama was “a sort of god.” (“In a way, Obama's standing above
the country, above -- above the world, a sort of god.")
Mr. Thomas never elaborated on just what “sort
of god” we all might expect Obama to be, but suffice it to say that he and his colleagues
who formed the bulwark of the Fourth Estate had conceived a mighty strong “crush”
on this U.S. Senator of two years tenure, most of it spent campaigning for
President. The crush demolished whatever critical capacities they might have exercised.
The Gods exist to be admired and worshiped, not criticized. With their fawning
adulation and uncritical devotion, by the time of his inauguration Obama became
the genius who was the resurrection and amalgamation of Abraham Lincoln, FDR
and JFK.
Obama was the refreshing, stunning contrast
first to the harridan, been-there-done-that Hillary Clinton then to George W.
Bush, by the end of his Presidency deemed to be intellectually, morally flawed
and deeply so. Bush now was a palooka, a political Piñada whom everyone took turns whacking. McCain, helpless
and old was no match. Obama
in stark contrast was a star – cool, contemporary, photogenic, an Olympian standing
high above the fray, descending only to bestow calm, impart his wisdom and
receive thanks.
Bush
was served up as the benighted antipode to an unblemished Obama, a uniquely
singular individual (The One), morally and cognitively complete, a phantasm proclaiming
that “We are the Change we Seek.” Obama thus became a totality, both the question and the answer, that Self, outside of which nothing else is important
or relevant. There was, however, no “We”. There was only Obama himself mirroring
the “Genius of Obama” to be held in contemplation, admiration and …
anticipation.
The
anticipation is long over and so is much of the admiration. With his re-election campaign of character assassination and four-plus
years of solipsistic rule we possess a real, empirical grasp of the “Change we
seek.” Our Chief is that Change, a change that has not turned out not to be what
many people who voted for him had in mind. Something very essential was lost in
the translation from rhetoric to reality. Like all of the other solipsistic princes, his
modifications of Self have produced nothing that seems to have made his
subjects, other than his friends and political supporters, any better off.
The
disappointment that inevitably follows in the wake of the prince’s shortcomings
of Self turns the solipsism into a rather ugly spectacle of blame and
resentment. Since the Self is perfect,
the appearance of the gross disparity between perfection and reality which inevitably
happens cannot be the doing or fault of the prince. With the arrival of the
dashed high expectations and the unfulfilled promises someone or something must
be blamed. The great solipsists have always been prodigious blamers. There is
nothing else, practically, for them to do, and when the time for it comes … be careful.
For the misery of his realm, Stalin
blamed the “wreckers” and “Trotsky,” Mao, the “capitalist roaders” and “running
dog imperialists,” and for Castro, it was “Uncle Sam.” Obama blames George Bush, the Republicans, and
the European financial crisis. There is always a scapegoat du jour. The blame brings into clear focus the objects of
the solipsist-prince’s acid resentment, namely those who have failed to
recognize his genius and conform to his perfect understanding. The blame enables
the prince to preserve for himself his image of his unsullied Self.
The
fate of the solipsist-Self is an immersion in resentment. It seems reasonable to predict that over the
next several months one will see in President Obama a man full of blame, increasingly
resentful. When he finally departs, resentment will be all that remains.
Comments (25)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
"Obama is a man of the left and the left hates guns more than almost anything else they remotely associate with the despised right, more than gas guzzlers, home school families, coal companies, confederate flags or pro-life protestors."
Fuck that bi-sexual deviant, communist nigger, that abomination who illegally occupied the Oval Office and disgraced this country for two-terms by this very fact.
Pardon my Yiddish.
Fuck that bi-sexual deviant, communist nigger, that abomination who illegally occupied the Oval Office and disgraced this country for two-terms by this very fact.
Pardon my Yiddish.
Black families were imported to Detroit as strike breakers to cross the picket line, when white men stood up on their hind legs and demanded to be treated equitably. Blacks were the useful idiots to help keep a lid on trade unions.
Blacks still play the fool, until it's time to play the rent a thug mob, to shake down productive citizens for the share of the FREE Gibs Me Dats!
Blacks still play the fool, until it's time to play the rent a thug mob, to shake down productive citizens for the share of the FREE Gibs Me Dats!
I do not believe racism is in any DNA, nor do I believe that President Obama knew or knows much about anything he talked or is talking about. Racism is not inherited. If you don't believe racism is learned, watch for awhile two little kids of different races playing with each other.
Dr. Rand Paul cites two studies about masks, both of which debunk the myth of the efficacy of masks in preventing the spread of Coronavirus. Just today, New York released their tracking data (another imperialistic tool used for controlling the masses) on the spread of Coronavirus in restaurants. It was 1.4%! Cuomo still ordered all restaurants and bars to close. I am quite sure there are few trustworthy corporations anymore, but my situation (older, some autoimmune disease) seems to compel me to make a voluntary choice and get the vaccine as soon as I can, even though I am fine so far. I go out a lot to church, some social gatherings, shopping, etc., but I take common-sense precautions used to prevent the spread of any virus. The Health Dictatorship, as Foster labels it, has got to be overthrown, otherwise the backbones of our economy and freedom, i.e., small businesses, will be destroyed. But perhaps that is, after all, the plan of the left!
By the way, Foster's new novel, Toward The Bad I Kept On Turning, is a great read. Though somewhat fantastical, it is chocked full of great stories and a lot of history. It is available on Amazon.
By the way, Foster's new novel, Toward The Bad I Kept On Turning, is a great read. Though somewhat fantastical, it is chocked full of great stories and a lot of history. It is available on Amazon.
Yeah, you can be a "racist" just by existing, without even thinking in "racist" terms or having "racist" motives. And if you simply want to state facts or have a conversation about racism, you will become a threat to the control aficionados, and will become racist by default. As foster suggests, if you're not part of the collective, you're not legitimate. And about diversity; is the "salad bowl" philosophy better than the old "melting pot" descriptor? No, not when speaking of nationalism. And the extremes to which the salad bowl philosophy have been taken certainly do not, as the Wokes claim, insure personal liberty. Just the opposite as diversity becomes groupthink!
Donald Trump's time is over! House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer have jointly asked Vice President Mike Pence to trigger Amendment No. 25 to dismiss President Trump.
What would anyone expect from far-left politicians like Pelosi and Schumer who, instead of preparing for the confirmation hearings for Biden's cabinet picks, would waste their time on this nonsense.
Foster has, once again, "hit the nail on the head." However, in my opinion, if the Democrats try to confiscate guns anywhere in this country, all hell will break loose!
They might not be so obvious about it. More likely they'll declare the manufacture of ammunition a contributor to global warming and order a halt to production.
When we visited Munich some years ago we decided to visit Dachau. The locals would not tell us how to get there or even admit of its existence. Nazification had indeed been accomplished, and continued even then. Now, here, we deplorables with our guns and God are being cancelled in much the same way. Those of you who doubt, make no mistake; gun control laws, including gun confiscation laws, will immediately increase as a first step, followed closely or even simultaneously by the attempt by the Democrats to once and for all institute an absolute right to practice their religion of abortion without limits. Wake up people. Foster is right. If we continue down the path of American denazification by altering our country's history through false and improper education and untrustworthy news, and if we do not expose the myth of "systemic" racism, our country, and all of its good people, will be totally ruled by and dependent on government. Is that what "the land of the free" is all about?
I didn't watch the inauguration because I was too busy doing more important things, so I can't comment first-hand on it. But from what I've seen and read about it, there were two differing observations. The conservative-leaning pundits and news media agreed with the assessment penned by Foster; the liberal news media thought it was "the best inauguration speech ever." Given the fact that it appears it was read verbatim from the teleprompter with no deviations, it obviously was not penned by Biden. It purportedly invoked religion and God more than any inauguration speech since Eisenhower. And this stuff was spouted by a man who represents a party whose religion is abortion! The best inauguration speech ever? Really? C'mon man!
Yes, millions can and have seen that Democracy has not prevailed. When the people turn over their power to the Washington Establishment, bolstered by a complicit mainstream media, only tyranny can result. Are we there yet?
The state should not be able to force people to give up the fundamental right to control over their own bodies unless exercising that right can be shown to be dangerous or detrimental to other people who also have the right to life. Abortion is an example; it's hard to argue that having an abortion is not really, really detrimental to another human life. The same can be true for vaccinations; if herd immunity is vitally important to the lives of everybody, then people can be forced to comply.
Another great blog from Stephen Foster. I religiously follow his blog, and though I sometimes disagree with him (see above) , I am never disappointed with his great thought processes, knowledge, and perfect-sense (usually) arguments and observations. This present blog is no exception: well-written and well- thought-out. I too, was a professor, and I share many of his experiences with the new "Studies curricula" and the problems and even downright horrors they brought and continue to bring. The cancel culture is, I believe, largely a product of the indoctrination graduates of these largely worthless grievance vocabulary majors have received and promulgated. Certainly the cancel culture has not made our lives happier, safer, nor more productive, as Foster points out by way of the rhetorical questions he asks at the end of the blog!
The New Normal will never be what I (and Foster, obviously) will ever accept. Even given our country's stated "rules of law," I fear people will have to get hurt before we jump over the cuckoo's nest.
There's that word "diversity" again popping up all over academia The results of invoking and then acting on the word in universities is mostly bull crap! I'm OK with you being diverse, as long as you don't mind me being diverse in different ways than you, and neither of us cause harm to each other or to others that are diverse from us. As famous Los Angeles actor Rodney King
once said, "Why can't we all just get along?
once said, "Why can't we all just get along?
Foster's recent post is ominous, predicting that our "democracy" is rapidly heading toward Marxism. Unfortunately, this is probably true. And yes, there is hope in resistance, but it may take much more than words and thoughts and is very scary to those of us who love our country!
From above: "Perceptions and opinions, as we know, tend to be error-prone, subjectively based, tendentious, and, at times held with fanatical fervor in the face of disconfirming, empirically-based reality." Very true. People's feelings often take precedence over facts, many times based on their own biases and observations and being convinced by a corrupt media that continually bombards them with confirming claptrap. But pretentious and insincere statements are often not true in the real world, and the failure of many to grasp that, either because of ignorance or because of willful denial, leads to failure, sometimes cataclysmic failure, of societies. Woke? I think not. Deceived? Absolutely!
It seems that our whole culture - or counter-culture now - has become one big abstraction. Though Foster makes the point, convincingly, I think, that we can't really declare war on an abstraction, perhaps we should do just that with the goal of quickly winning that war and getting back, as a new normal, to things that really matter to us.
I think the whole premise of "Hitler" returning has to do with the fear of the Washington D.C. politicians that the swamp will be drained and, thus, power lost. That can't be allowed to happen, so new Hitlers are discovered to take the focus off of the massive failures, avarice, and dishonesty practiced by the swamp creatures. For example, when Trump was elected, he had to be made a Hitler. His populist ideas and promises made could not be allowed to stand. And even though Trump accomplished a lot and kept a lot of promises, he had to be maligned even if it meant that the country would suffer. The mainstream news organizations were willing co-conspirators in this endeavor, and even now conspire to cover up the obvious and severe shortfalls of the new President. As a wise character named Pogo once said, "We have met the enemy, and he is us."
According to those on the left, everything white people do is racist. But, as Foster points out, nothing people of color do can possibly be racist. Astonishingly, we now have racist highways that were perpetrated on people of color by white people. But it should be apparent to all that the mainstream media, illustrated by what they say and how they say (or don't say) it, are definitely racist themselves. Racially-incited hatred from virtually every leftist group now, is becoming rampant, and we must find the truth-telling to end it! Thanks Stephen, for your truth telling.
Foster's newest blog, Moscow to Minneapolis, is not only true, but is "right on" in every respect. This is an absolutely great blog. And of course, as always, Foster makes his points so well with his mastery of the written word.
How did we (The citizens of the United States) get to this point of "collective madness" where we allow "Critical Race Theory" to not only explain everything but explain away everything not deemed desirable by so few?" Whatever happened to embracing critique and disagreement and civil discourse?
When, exactly, did the fourth estate morph almost completely into the fifth column and become the propaganda arm of the fictional systemic racism believers?
How did we (The citizens of the United States) get to this point of "collective madness" where we allow "Critical Race Theory" to not only explain everything but explain away everything not deemed desirable by so few?" Whatever happened to embracing critique and disagreement and civil discourse?
When, exactly, did the fourth estate morph almost completely into the fifth column and become the propaganda arm of the fictional systemic racism believers?
Why can't we all just get along? - Rodney King Possibly because there are many, usually on one side of the Black vs. White conflict, who prefer not to do so. Rather, they prefer to manufacture their own justice, whether it fits the facts or not.
This last blog about embalmed former "leaders" was interesting and readable. As I read it and the reference to Biden, I began to wonder if dementia could be compared to a kind of premature embalming. Surely Biden's present thought processes are little better than those that would come from a preserved corpse. And if Dr. Jill was not around to lead him out of his wandering ways and otherwise direct him, would old Joe be able to get through any day without being compared to an animated yet relatively mindless decedent? Which begs the question, did thinking people really vote for him? And, if so, can they succinctly explain why other than because they "hated" Trump?
Comments by IntenseDebate
Posting anonymously.
Labels:
2008 Presidential Campaign,
Abraham Lincoln,
Barack Obama,
Chris Matthews,
Evan Thomas,
FDR,
George W. Bush,
Hillary Clinton,
Hollywood celebrities,
John Kennedy,
John McCain,
Joseph Stalin,
Mao Tse Tung
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment