Commentary on Communist history and ideology with comparisons to other Totalitarian ideologies and movements. Also links contemporary political events to ideological themes and trends.
Thursday, July 12, 2012
Obama, the Jacobin, or, The Coercer-in-Chief
“The revolutionary government
owes to good citizens all the protection of the nation. It owes the enemies of
the people only death.”
Maximilian
Robespierre, 1793
We're gonna punish our enemies
and we're gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are
important to us.
Barack
Obama, 2010
In 1793
the Jacobin rulers in Paris carried their war against the Church into the Vendée and sent federal troops to attack the refractory priests,
small town dwellers and peasants. These people were the French antecedents of our
own “bitter clingers to their guns and
religion” of rural Pennsylvania, the targets of Candidate Obama’s
demeaning, condescending sneer in 2008. The Jacobins carried out a scored earth
response to the resistance of the Vendeans. They burned farms, raised villages and killed indiscriminately.
Reynald Secher, a French historian, has
called what the Jacobins did, A French
Genocide, the title of his book, published in 1986, translated into English
and published by Notre Dame University Press in 2003.
These
Republican disciples of J.J. Rousseau were fixed upon the destruction of the
old order, a “transformation,” so to speak.
This was a different regime, new in history, run by ideologues who
sought to create a new kind of man and a new kind of society. This was the birth of the concept of the
modern totalitarian state as described decades ago by J. L. Talmon, in his
book, The Origins of Totalitarian
Democracy. The first Jacobins were French, but their ideology was a highly
exportable commodity taken up later by Russian, Chinese and Cuban intellectuals
who were all practitioners of what they called, “Revolution,” a euphemism for
their program of complete annihilation of the ruling class they loathed,
including the confiscation of their property, the eradication of their
liberties and finally their physical destruction.
Americans
have long been reluctant to give power to revolution-prone grievance mongers
but in 2008, the voters put a Jacobin into the Whitehouse, a grievance-nurturing
man whose 20 year mentor and pastor was an America-loathing fanatic. Five days before his election Barack Obama proclaimed
that “We are
five days from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.” He
did not at that time elaborate what he was intending but nearly four years
later it is pretty clear what he had in mind. Fundamental transformation was Obama-speak for
Revolution and it is what he has been
about since the day he was sworn into office.
Jacobins,
whenever and wherever they come to rule over others, step into their positions
of authority with overweening ambition and loaded with the arrogance of power. The
Jacobins arrive with a fanatical moral certainty that lets them give full
indulgence to their utopian impulses, no matter what the practical destruction
that occurs. They are intent not on governing but on “transformation” to use
the President’s own terminology. Institutions must be dismantled, tradition
overthrown, people made (coerced) into being virtuous. Tax them, regulate them,
fine them and revile them appears to be President Obama’s modus operandi. “Punish
our enemies and reward our friends,” as the President himself so succinctly
expressed it in 2010 to his followers – the velvet glove of Hope and Change is now the mailed fist
of My Way or the Highway. Texas,
Oklahoma and Arizona seem to be part of President Obama’s own Vendée,
places whose inhabitants need to be brought under heel and taught who is in
charge.
Mr.
Obama possesses all of the requisite Jacobin traits. First, he is a “Knower,” of rare and
remarkable powers. From the early
days when he burst upon the national scene as a serious candidate for the
highest office there broke forth from his enthusiasts a loud and steady chorus proclaiming
his unmatched brilliance and vast intellectual powers. Unlike his predecessors he was “smart,” “a great teacher, sort of a god, standing
above us,” having “the highest IQ of
any President.” Mr. Obama himself was no less assured of his unique status
as a universal genius as he strolled before his adoring crowds promising to “change America and the world,” to “heal the planet” and similar modest
undertakings.
His vast
cognitive superiority in his own mind entitled him to
exert
as much power as he needed to do whatever he wanted. Thus we see in him the
second core element of the Jacobin’s soul – a relentless quest for control over
the lives of other people.
Controlling the
lives of people is what Jacobins are all about and explains their love for
coercion. Because they know and
understand what others do not they believe themselves to be entirely justified
in forcing the refractory, “bitter
clingers” to be what they, the Jacobins, want to them to be, which is
reflecting mirrors, imperfect albeit, of
themselves. Jacobins not only demand obedience,
they require constant adulation and admiration as well.
Obama like all
Jacobins is a lover of coercion, the most conspicuous manifestation being
ObamaCare, a massive, incomprehensible 2000 page work of complexity, confusion
and obfuscation. Its fundamental purpose
is to be a legal instrument of such expansive and intrusive reach as to render
all Americans in matters of health (physical and mental) completely dependent
upon government lawyers, bureaucrats,
and lobbyists – helpless before their Jacobin masters who, of course, have
never sought anything but the well-being of their subjects. Obama Care is an
unprecedented labor of coercion. The oversight
of your physical and mental well-being amounts to total control over you. Mr. Obama is also loading up the IRS with many
additional agents – a coercer-President needs many additional hands to do his
work of forced extraction.
Government coercion is a constantly expanding
and dominating feature of American life. To see the work of our government at
its coercive best go to any airport. Watch the countless number of ordinary,
law-abiding citizens forced (coerced) to act like motely inmates of a
county-jail work detail as they are made to strip off their clothes – jackets,
belts, shoes, jewelry – and thrust their
wrist-clasped arms above their heads in symbolic surrender before the scanners
of their naked bodies. Ordered about by the legions of federal warders, they
must watch them paw through their personal belongings, pat down old women and
young children, their hands intruding into very private parts of the body.
It did not use
to be like this and does not have to be like this. Little of these humiliating and stupid rituals
have anything to do with security: their secondary purpose is to harass and
intimidate which underlies the primary purpose which is to make everyone clearly
understand that their government can do what
it wants whenever it wants to whomever it chooses. Airport security, of course, is what those of
us who are ruled have to endure. Complain
and see what happens to you. The rulers, themselves, of course, never have to experience
these indignities, submit to the gropers, have their possessions handled by the
rubber-gloved crews. And why should they?
Jacobins make the rules for others to follow. For beings of superior
virtue and wisdom, they are not necessary.
The airport
model of coercion is what the current Jacobins would like all of life in
America to be like for those in their charge.
Comments (25)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
"Obama is a man of the left and the left hates guns more than almost anything else they remotely associate with the despised right, more than gas guzzlers, home school families, coal companies, confederate flags or pro-life protestors."
Fuck that bi-sexual deviant, communist nigger, that abomination who illegally occupied the Oval Office and disgraced this country for two-terms by this very fact.
Pardon my Yiddish.
Fuck that bi-sexual deviant, communist nigger, that abomination who illegally occupied the Oval Office and disgraced this country for two-terms by this very fact.
Pardon my Yiddish.
Black families were imported to Detroit as strike breakers to cross the picket line, when white men stood up on their hind legs and demanded to be treated equitably. Blacks were the useful idiots to help keep a lid on trade unions.
Blacks still play the fool, until it's time to play the rent a thug mob, to shake down productive citizens for the share of the FREE Gibs Me Dats!
Blacks still play the fool, until it's time to play the rent a thug mob, to shake down productive citizens for the share of the FREE Gibs Me Dats!
I do not believe racism is in any DNA, nor do I believe that President Obama knew or knows much about anything he talked or is talking about. Racism is not inherited. If you don't believe racism is learned, watch for awhile two little kids of different races playing with each other.
Dr. Rand Paul cites two studies about masks, both of which debunk the myth of the efficacy of masks in preventing the spread of Coronavirus. Just today, New York released their tracking data (another imperialistic tool used for controlling the masses) on the spread of Coronavirus in restaurants. It was 1.4%! Cuomo still ordered all restaurants and bars to close. I am quite sure there are few trustworthy corporations anymore, but my situation (older, some autoimmune disease) seems to compel me to make a voluntary choice and get the vaccine as soon as I can, even though I am fine so far. I go out a lot to church, some social gatherings, shopping, etc., but I take common-sense precautions used to prevent the spread of any virus. The Health Dictatorship, as Foster labels it, has got to be overthrown, otherwise the backbones of our economy and freedom, i.e., small businesses, will be destroyed. But perhaps that is, after all, the plan of the left!
By the way, Foster's new novel, Toward The Bad I Kept On Turning, is a great read. Though somewhat fantastical, it is chocked full of great stories and a lot of history. It is available on Amazon.
By the way, Foster's new novel, Toward The Bad I Kept On Turning, is a great read. Though somewhat fantastical, it is chocked full of great stories and a lot of history. It is available on Amazon.
Yeah, you can be a "racist" just by existing, without even thinking in "racist" terms or having "racist" motives. And if you simply want to state facts or have a conversation about racism, you will become a threat to the control aficionados, and will become racist by default. As foster suggests, if you're not part of the collective, you're not legitimate. And about diversity; is the "salad bowl" philosophy better than the old "melting pot" descriptor? No, not when speaking of nationalism. And the extremes to which the salad bowl philosophy have been taken certainly do not, as the Wokes claim, insure personal liberty. Just the opposite as diversity becomes groupthink!
Donald Trump's time is over! House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer have jointly asked Vice President Mike Pence to trigger Amendment No. 25 to dismiss President Trump.
What would anyone expect from far-left politicians like Pelosi and Schumer who, instead of preparing for the confirmation hearings for Biden's cabinet picks, would waste their time on this nonsense.
Foster has, once again, "hit the nail on the head." However, in my opinion, if the Democrats try to confiscate guns anywhere in this country, all hell will break loose!
They might not be so obvious about it. More likely they'll declare the manufacture of ammunition a contributor to global warming and order a halt to production.
When we visited Munich some years ago we decided to visit Dachau. The locals would not tell us how to get there or even admit of its existence. Nazification had indeed been accomplished, and continued even then. Now, here, we deplorables with our guns and God are being cancelled in much the same way. Those of you who doubt, make no mistake; gun control laws, including gun confiscation laws, will immediately increase as a first step, followed closely or even simultaneously by the attempt by the Democrats to once and for all institute an absolute right to practice their religion of abortion without limits. Wake up people. Foster is right. If we continue down the path of American denazification by altering our country's history through false and improper education and untrustworthy news, and if we do not expose the myth of "systemic" racism, our country, and all of its good people, will be totally ruled by and dependent on government. Is that what "the land of the free" is all about?
I didn't watch the inauguration because I was too busy doing more important things, so I can't comment first-hand on it. But from what I've seen and read about it, there were two differing observations. The conservative-leaning pundits and news media agreed with the assessment penned by Foster; the liberal news media thought it was "the best inauguration speech ever." Given the fact that it appears it was read verbatim from the teleprompter with no deviations, it obviously was not penned by Biden. It purportedly invoked religion and God more than any inauguration speech since Eisenhower. And this stuff was spouted by a man who represents a party whose religion is abortion! The best inauguration speech ever? Really? C'mon man!
Yes, millions can and have seen that Democracy has not prevailed. When the people turn over their power to the Washington Establishment, bolstered by a complicit mainstream media, only tyranny can result. Are we there yet?
The state should not be able to force people to give up the fundamental right to control over their own bodies unless exercising that right can be shown to be dangerous or detrimental to other people who also have the right to life. Abortion is an example; it's hard to argue that having an abortion is not really, really detrimental to another human life. The same can be true for vaccinations; if herd immunity is vitally important to the lives of everybody, then people can be forced to comply.
Another great blog from Stephen Foster. I religiously follow his blog, and though I sometimes disagree with him (see above) , I am never disappointed with his great thought processes, knowledge, and perfect-sense (usually) arguments and observations. This present blog is no exception: well-written and well- thought-out. I too, was a professor, and I share many of his experiences with the new "Studies curricula" and the problems and even downright horrors they brought and continue to bring. The cancel culture is, I believe, largely a product of the indoctrination graduates of these largely worthless grievance vocabulary majors have received and promulgated. Certainly the cancel culture has not made our lives happier, safer, nor more productive, as Foster points out by way of the rhetorical questions he asks at the end of the blog!
The New Normal will never be what I (and Foster, obviously) will ever accept. Even given our country's stated "rules of law," I fear people will have to get hurt before we jump over the cuckoo's nest.
There's that word "diversity" again popping up all over academia The results of invoking and then acting on the word in universities is mostly bull crap! I'm OK with you being diverse, as long as you don't mind me being diverse in different ways than you, and neither of us cause harm to each other or to others that are diverse from us. As famous Los Angeles actor Rodney King
once said, "Why can't we all just get along?
once said, "Why can't we all just get along?
Foster's recent post is ominous, predicting that our "democracy" is rapidly heading toward Marxism. Unfortunately, this is probably true. And yes, there is hope in resistance, but it may take much more than words and thoughts and is very scary to those of us who love our country!
From above: "Perceptions and opinions, as we know, tend to be error-prone, subjectively based, tendentious, and, at times held with fanatical fervor in the face of disconfirming, empirically-based reality." Very true. People's feelings often take precedence over facts, many times based on their own biases and observations and being convinced by a corrupt media that continually bombards them with confirming claptrap. But pretentious and insincere statements are often not true in the real world, and the failure of many to grasp that, either because of ignorance or because of willful denial, leads to failure, sometimes cataclysmic failure, of societies. Woke? I think not. Deceived? Absolutely!
It seems that our whole culture - or counter-culture now - has become one big abstraction. Though Foster makes the point, convincingly, I think, that we can't really declare war on an abstraction, perhaps we should do just that with the goal of quickly winning that war and getting back, as a new normal, to things that really matter to us.
I think the whole premise of "Hitler" returning has to do with the fear of the Washington D.C. politicians that the swamp will be drained and, thus, power lost. That can't be allowed to happen, so new Hitlers are discovered to take the focus off of the massive failures, avarice, and dishonesty practiced by the swamp creatures. For example, when Trump was elected, he had to be made a Hitler. His populist ideas and promises made could not be allowed to stand. And even though Trump accomplished a lot and kept a lot of promises, he had to be maligned even if it meant that the country would suffer. The mainstream news organizations were willing co-conspirators in this endeavor, and even now conspire to cover up the obvious and severe shortfalls of the new President. As a wise character named Pogo once said, "We have met the enemy, and he is us."
According to those on the left, everything white people do is racist. But, as Foster points out, nothing people of color do can possibly be racist. Astonishingly, we now have racist highways that were perpetrated on people of color by white people. But it should be apparent to all that the mainstream media, illustrated by what they say and how they say (or don't say) it, are definitely racist themselves. Racially-incited hatred from virtually every leftist group now, is becoming rampant, and we must find the truth-telling to end it! Thanks Stephen, for your truth telling.
Foster's newest blog, Moscow to Minneapolis, is not only true, but is "right on" in every respect. This is an absolutely great blog. And of course, as always, Foster makes his points so well with his mastery of the written word.
How did we (The citizens of the United States) get to this point of "collective madness" where we allow "Critical Race Theory" to not only explain everything but explain away everything not deemed desirable by so few?" Whatever happened to embracing critique and disagreement and civil discourse?
When, exactly, did the fourth estate morph almost completely into the fifth column and become the propaganda arm of the fictional systemic racism believers?
How did we (The citizens of the United States) get to this point of "collective madness" where we allow "Critical Race Theory" to not only explain everything but explain away everything not deemed desirable by so few?" Whatever happened to embracing critique and disagreement and civil discourse?
When, exactly, did the fourth estate morph almost completely into the fifth column and become the propaganda arm of the fictional systemic racism believers?
Why can't we all just get along? - Rodney King Possibly because there are many, usually on one side of the Black vs. White conflict, who prefer not to do so. Rather, they prefer to manufacture their own justice, whether it fits the facts or not.
This last blog about embalmed former "leaders" was interesting and readable. As I read it and the reference to Biden, I began to wonder if dementia could be compared to a kind of premature embalming. Surely Biden's present thought processes are little better than those that would come from a preserved corpse. And if Dr. Jill was not around to lead him out of his wandering ways and otherwise direct him, would old Joe be able to get through any day without being compared to an animated yet relatively mindless decedent? Which begs the question, did thinking people really vote for him? And, if so, can they succinctly explain why other than because they "hated" Trump?
Comments by IntenseDebate
Posting anonymously.
Labels:
Barack Obama,
French Revolution,
J.J. Rousseau,
Jacobins,
Maximilian Robespierre,
War of the Vendee
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment